Has anyone else noticed this. It is quicker to give flowers from the bottom of the page up than it is to give them from the top down. That is they load quicker or am I just imagining this. Marg
24826
Phewwww!!!! I don't need a shrink after all. Thanks for all your comments. Love Marg
24826
255054Yep, I found that out a while back, it takes forever for them to take if you go top to bottom but going up the flower just appears even though you are 3 more up on the list. Flowers for everyone!!!
33580I agree, Marg. I found that out, too. As my internet connection shapes and slows down towards the end of the month I have found it quicker. or more convenient, to give flowers from the bottom of the page up. The page doesn't jump around so much that way.
There... you all got another flower (because I read all of the messages) and it took me only a few seconds.
AlmaG>
17214YES Marg, that is how I always do it - much quicker and what a nice thing - as the result of this - you get even more flowers, too. *4U
211079I am not a shrink, but I am a techy. Many variables play a roll in this: speed of your computer, bandwidth of your connection to the WAN (Wide Area Network)even the number of computers on the network at any given moment. I could go on but it does not really matter. All in all a flower is a flower. *4U
Cindy B.
11473
24342
60484That is so funny Marg, because that is the way I've recently been doing them.
9983Ok, I just started from the bottom and gave everyone a * on my way up. Now I'm going to go from top to bottom on another post and see which is faster. Not very scientific, but oh well.
Carol
12165didnt know that but will use it from now on thankyou Cathy
4586yes your imagining things lol i just had to say that Marg lol in thruth i don't kn ow but i will try it & get back to you ok carolyn
2 comments
360660Oh yes, been doing it that way for some time now. On the project pages it's ok to just give as you go down. :-)
1 comment
23222